Oaks was fined 100,000 yuan for false promotion of air conditioning energy efficiency

According to the CCTV Financial News, on April 10, the Ningbo Municipal Market Supervision Bureau made an administrative ruling decision on “Responsible Order Correction” and “Execution of 100,000 Yuan” for the false publicity of Oaks Air Conditioning Co., Ltd. using the energy efficiency label.Air Force, Oaks were publicly reported by Gree to produce and sell unqualified air-conditioning products.According to the alleged administrative decision decision, on June 28, 2019, the Ningbo Municipal Market Supervision Administration received the report materials from the superior bureau regarding the failure of the energy efficiency labels of 8 models of air conditioners by Oaks Air Conditioning Co., Ltd. to be decided on the same day.When to file a case.On August 15, 2019, the Ningbo Municipal Market Supervision and Administration Bureau handled the report of the other six types of air conditioners transferred by the superior bureau in one case.After investigation by Ningbo Municipal Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, and in the production field and home appliance stores, specialty stores and e-commerce platforms and other distribution areas, the 14 air conditioners involved were randomly allocated, and entrusted with a legally qualified inspection agency for testing.The KFR-35GW / ZC + 2 type air conditioner with a factory code of 114841001811201629 produced on November 20, 2018 and an indoor unit produced on April 3, 2019 with a factory code of 017134001904031924 produced a cooling power consumption of 1138.3W, energy efficiency ratio 3.21W / W, energy efficiency level 3, and the information on the energy efficiency label does not match.The Ningbo Municipal Market Supervision Bureau believes that air-conditioning is an energy-saving product with great energy-saving potential and a wide range of uses. According to the Energy Conservation Law of the People ‘s Republic of China, energy efficiency label management is implemented, and producers should respond to the energy efficiency label and related information marked by it.Of experts.In order to better promote its air-conditioning products, highlight the characteristics of energy saving and energy saving, mark the energy efficiency label with input power, energy efficiency ratio, energy efficiency rating and other energy efficiency index information that does not match the actual, and point out the second of the energy efficiency label in the manualThe display on the link page of the QR code exaggerates the energy-saving performance, which violates the provisions of Article 19, paragraph 3 of the Energy Conservation Law of the People’s Republic of China, and belongs to the act of “false propaganda using the energy efficiency logo”.According to the third paragraph of Article 73 of the “Energy Conservation Law of the People ‘s Republic of China”, “the use of energy efficiency labels for false propaganda shall be ordered by the market supervision and management department to be corrected and shall be marked with more than 5 million and less than 10 million”, NingboThe Municipal Market Supervision Bureau decided: 1.Order to correct; 2.100,000 bills.Editor Yang Li Source: CCTV Finance